Beautiful Losers
CRITIQUE | QUOTES
First editionFirst publication
1966
Literature form
Novel
Genres
Literary
Writing language
English
Author's country
Canada
Length
Approx. 178,000 words
Frenzied thoughts prove enduring
I have no idea why this supposed novel has remained so popular.
I can see how its liberal use of crude, four-letter words—presented not with shocking effect but as mundane, even romantic, language—might have appealed in the striving-to-be-liberated 1960s and 1970s, but I can't imagine how Beautiful Losers makes any waves in these more jaded times.
The chaotic stream-of-consciousness style, the relentless poetic qualities of the language and the experimentalism of its format—with prayers, advertising, pages of capitalized words and other bizarre content—would all seem to add up to something that might catch the fancy of the avant-garde set. It could perhaps spread to the public intrigued by Leonard Cohen's mysterious persona at the time. But surely it would become an embarrassing relic within a couple of decades.
Apparently not.
The main three characters of Beautiful Losers (and it is a great title) are involved in an odd ménage à trois, always an attention-getter. But most of what they do is report research into a seventeenth-century Iroquois maiden who became a Catholic saint. The most vivid imagery in this poet's novel is reserved for the tortures of priests and self-flagellation of the devout. All in all, hardly what you'd expect to be continuing popular fare.
But Beautiful Losers has sold nearly a million copies and continues to be in demand today. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, its critical acclaim has never been higher.
Like I said, I don't get it. Personally, in my second reading of the novel I had to skim many pages which seemed too self-indulgent or obscurely personal. Sophomoric. Boring, even. Then I'd hit some viciously funny stuff or some brilliantly crafted paragraphs that would remind me a real talent was at work here.
Calling this an example of "stream of consciousness" is not quite correct. I don't think Cohen is really trying to transcribe anyone's thoughts as they occur. It's more like free association. Free association in prose by a poet whose mind is at all times charged with the strangest assortment of ideas. More like Jack Kerouac or the Beat poets maybe? But not really like anyone else.
Advice to Chinese readers
When a translation of Beautiful Losers was being published in China in 2000 (I can't imagine what such a translation would be like, nor what the Chinese would make of it), Cohen wrote a letter to his fans there in which he thanked them for being interested in the "frenzied thoughts of my youth".
He also wrote:
This is a difficult book, even in English, if it is taken too seriously. May I suggest that you skip over the parts you don't like? Dip into it here and there. Perhaps there will be a passage, or even a page, that resonates with your curiosity. After a while, if you are sufficiently bored or unemployed, you may want to read it from cover to cover. In any case, I thank you for your interest in this odd collection of jazz riffs, pop-art jokes, religious kitsch and muffled prayer....
Beautiful Losers was written outside, on a table set among the rocks, weeds and daisies, behind my house on Hydra, an island in the Aegean Sea. I lived there many years ago. It was a blazing hot summer. I never covered my head. What you have in your hands is more of a sunstroke than a book.
Now that's good writing. Explains a lot too.
Beautiful Losers is not much of a novel though. But an experience. An experience of sunstroke.
— Eric
CRITIQUE | QUOTES
