Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Isn't all this keeping of lists, ranking of books, rather superficial? Doesn't it run counter to the spirit of true literary appreciation?
Yes to the first question. This is a superficial exercise. The reading is the important thing. The invention of best-of lists can be a trivial pursuit.
No to the second part. Presenting a list is worthwhile in getting people to read books they might not otherwise consider. I know I've been led into some wonderful reading experiences by leads provided on other peoples' lists.
And the discussion of literature that a list engenders is valuable and enjoyable. At least I have found it so.