Shakespeare painting

William Shakespeare

Plays, poetry
Works on Greatest lists
Greatest Literature

A Midsummmer Night’s Dream (1594)

Romeo and Juliet (c.1596)

Henry IV, Part 1 (1597)

The Merchant of Venice (c.1597)

Julius Caesar (1599)

Hamlet (1601)

Othello (1604)

Macbeth (c.1606)

King Lear (c.1606)

Sonnets (c.1609)

The Tempest (1611)

Greatest Plays

Richard III (1591)

The Taming of the Shrew (1591)

A Midsummmer Night’s Dream (1594)

Richard II (1597)

Romeo and Juliet (c.1596)

Love's Labour's Lost (1597)

Henry IV, Part 1 (1597)

Henry IV, Part 2 (1597)

The Merchant of Venice (c.1597)

Much Ado About Nothing (1598–1599)

As You Like It (1599)

Henry V (1599)

Julius Caesar (1599)

Hamlet (1601)

Twelfth Night (1601–1602)

Measure for Measure (1603)

Othello (1604)

Macbeth (c.1606)

King Lear (c.1606)

Coriolanus (c.1603)

The Winter's Tale (1611)

The Tempest (1611)

Henry VIII (1613)

Related commentaries
Romeo and Juliet

Possibly Shakespeare's best-known play. Everyone knows the story of star-crossed lovers who defied their families—the feuding Capulets and Montagues—and ended their lives tragically.... more

Henry IV, Part 1l

I once read all Shakespeare's historical plays in chronological order. Not in the order he wrote them, but in the order of the historical events they supposedly relate. Like many before me.... more

The Merchant of Venice

The major issue of contention whenever The Merchant of Venice comes up, of course, is the portrayal of Shylock, the Jewish money-lender, the villain of the piece for the most part. so let's.... more

Julius Caesar

This play ought to be called Brutus, since the central theme concerns that character's decision to join an assassination conspiracy and the repercussions of his action. Caesar is.... more


Hamlet is such a famous play—so much the great drama, the one play that everyone in the world can quote at least six words from—that we usually can't see how strange it is that this.... more

King Lear

A straightforward play really, about a dysfunctional family. People thinks it's cosmic because of that annoying storm in the middle. That's not my opinion but the summary of Jonathan.... more


Macbeth was actually king of Scotland for seventeen years, though you would never get this from Shakespeare's most popular play. Historians consider Macbeth and his wife to have been.... more


Interesting thing about Othello is that it concerns a man of African heritage who is victimized in a white European society, and yet racism is never the central issue. Othello, the.... more


Shakespeare's sonnets have been dissected and speculated upon for profound and hidden meanings for years, but I think the best way into them for a novice is to consider them as Shakespeare.... more

The Tempest

My favourite play. I'm not exactly sure why. It doesn't present many of the elements generally admired in drama. No great tragedy. Not much scintillating wit. Little realism. A fantastic... more

William Shakespeare


What he wrote—and what really happened

The plays usually considered Shakespeare's "histories" include only those set in England.

The Roman and other historically based plays, like Julius Caesar or Anthony and Cleopatra, are generally considered tragedies, rather than histories.

A few others that deal with very early, quasi-mythical British history, like King Lear, Macbeth and Cymbeline, are also classed as tragedies or comedies, rather than as histories.

The source of most of the material Shakespeare dramatizes in the British historical plays is thought to be Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland, often called just Holinshed's Chronicles. It was published in 1577 and expanded in a later second edition, which Shakespeare likely studied at school.

This source material, however, was not always accurate by later standards. Moreover, when dealing in his plays with recent royal figures—Queen Elizabeth's predecessors—Shakespeare adopted the Tudor perspective which was in favour at the time.

Here's a comparison of the known historical events and the same events as depicted by Shakespeare's plays, in order of the historical events.

King John

Historical period: 1203–1216
What really happened:
John, youngest son of Henry II and known as John Lackland, had become king in 1199. He had his nephew Arthur killed in 1203, fought with Philip II of France in 1204–1205 over the Aquitaine, quarrelled with the Church 1206–1213. He died of dysentery in 1216 while fighting the barons. Historically John is best known for having been forced to sign the Magna Carta in 1215, transferring some of his power to the barons and founding individual freedoms under a constitutional monarchy.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written 1594–1597
• Shakespeare condenses the time period, adds a confusion over Arthur's death, and conflates the battles with the Church and the battles with the barons.
• Incidentally John is also the villanous monarch in the Robin Hood stories as the usurper of his brother King Richard's throne. All the sons of Henry II are also portrayed as schemers in James Goldman's play (adapted to films) The Lion in Winter.

Richard II

Historical period: 1397–1400
What really happened:
Richard had become king in 1377 at age 10. He had Gloucester murdered in 1397 and banished Bolingbroke (the future Henry IV) in 1398. John of Gaunt died in 1399. Bolingbroke deposed Richard in 1399 and Richard died of starvation in 1400. He may have been insane in his latter years.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1592–1596
• This is first of Shakespeare's tetralogy of plays written in order (followed by the two Henry IVs and Henry V), dealing with early 15th-century British history.
• Shakespeare obviously sides with Bolingbroke. Although he makes him responsible for Richard's death, he also has him repent.
• When the play was produced, Queen Elizabeth thought she might be identified with Richard and had the deposition scene struck from the play. When Essex rebelled against her, he is supposed to have bribed Shakespeare's company to put the scene back in.

Henry IV, Part 1

Historical period: 1400–1403
What really happened:
Henry IV had become king in 1399 after replacing Richard II. His son, Prince Hal, had been close to Richard III. As heir apparent, Hal took part in government and battle on the king's side but differed with his father over the king's policies. Glendower started a Welsh rebellion in 1401 and allied with Henry Percy Hotspur. In 1403 Hal joined his father in battle against Hotspur at Shrewsbury, where Hostpur was defeated and slain and where Hal was seriously wounded.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1596–1597
• Shakespeare exaggerates the wildness of Prince Hal's youth and changes the time sequence.
• Falstaff, as well as the other thieves and layabouts with whom Hal carouses in the play, appear to be largely invented characters.
• Shakespeare also makes the Shrewsbury battle more dramatic by arranging direct confrontations between the leaders, culminating in Prince Hal personally killing Hotspur.

Henry IV, Part 2

Historical period: 1403–1413
What really happened:
Northumberland (the Percy family) continued to fight until finally defeated in 1408. Glendower and other rebels carried on—spasmodically to the end of Henry IV's reign. Henry died in 1413.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1596–1598
• Again Shakespeare drastically compresses time.
• There was likely no sudden change of heart by the prince nor deathbed acceptance of his son by the king, as the prince had been involved in fighting rebels on his father's behalf and holding civic positions since 1402.

Henry V

Historical period: 1415–1422
What really happened:
Henry V had become king in 1413. He invaded France in 1415 and won the battle of Agincourt. The peace treaty was signed and Henry married Katherine in 1420.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1594–1597
• The play is relatively faithful to history, although all the subplots of Henry's eve-of-battle rambles, the glove-in-the-hat episodes, and the exploits of Falstaff's successors in roguery—Pistol and Bardolph—are undoubtedly fictional.

Henry VI, Part 1

Historical period: 1422–1445
What really happened:
Henry V died in 1422 and Henry VI succeeded at the age of one. Joan of Arc helped capture Orleans For France in 1429. She was captured and executed in 1431. Henry was crowned king of France in 1431 at age 10 and married Margaret of Anjou in 1445.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1591–1592
• This starts another tetralogy dealing with British history, written earlier but taken from a later historical period. Scholars are undecided whether Shakespeare wrote only a few scenes in this play, especially the apocryphal origins of the War of the Roses in a garden debate, or wrote it all.
• Henry VI's age is increased to make him part of the intrigue. Years, even decades, between actual events are wiped out.
• Joan of Arc is a loose-living witch in this British play, rather than the heroic, sainted virgin of French legend.

Henry VI, Part 2

Historical period: 1430s–1455
What really happened:
Gloucester was Protector or Regent off and on until 1437 while the king was a youth. Gloucester's wife was exiled for witchcraft in 1446. He was charged with treason in 1447 but died of natural causes. Cardinal Beaufort also died in 1447. John Cade led the London rebellion in 1450 and died of wounds afterwards. York seized power as Protector in 1454. He won the first battle of the War of the Roses at St. Albans in 1455.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1590–159
• The play compresses the timeline, mixes up historical events and hypothesizes events—such as the supposed murder of Gloucester—with little evidence.
• However, these inaccuracies, like many of those in Shakespeare's plays, may have been based on the chronicles available at the time, rather than have been created by the playwright.

Henry VI, Part 3

Historical period: 1450s–1471
What really happened:
York is killed in battle in 1460. The battle of Towton was fought in 1461 and led to the royal family fleeing to Scotland and York's eldest son, Edward, being crowned. Henry returned to fight in 1464 but was captured. He was restored to the throne in 1470 but lost it to Edward IV again the next year at the battle of Tewkesbury. He was murdered in the Tower in 1471.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1590–1592
The third Henry VI play is thought more likely to have been written by Shakespeare. Once more the events are compressed into a much shorter period, and principals are shown committing acts personally that would have have been carried out through intermediaries. But the events do more or less follow historical order.

Richard III

Historical period: 1470s–1485
What really happened:
Edward IV had replaced Henry VI as king but Edward's brother Clarence was charged with plotting his death and was killed (rumoured by drowning in wine) in 1478. When Edward died in 1483 from natural causes, his son succeeded as king. But Edward's youngest brother Richard took the throne and imprisoned Edward's two sons who later disappeared. He put down a rebellion by Buckingham the same year and had him executed. He was killed in the battle of Bosworth Field in 1485 by the forces of the Earl of Richmond, Henry Tudor, who was crowned as Henry VII and married Edward IV's daughter to end the War of the Roses.
What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1592–1596
• The most controversial of Shakespeare's histories, Richard III follows the practice of the Tudors—of which Queen Elizabeth I was the latest representative—of vilifying the Plantagenets. Richard was depicted as an evil hunchback who pitted his brothers against each other, seized power illegally and had his nephews murdered.
• Historians have argued about how much of that picture is true. The Plantagenet Society has long argued that Richard was not the monster depicted in this play. Recent discoveries indicate he did have a twisted spine but it is unknown whether he had Edward's sons killed.
• One point is certain though, Richard was not slain in battle personally by Richmond (the future Henry VII), as depicted in the play.

Henry VIII

Historical period: 1530–1536
What really happened:
Henry VIII had succeeded his father Henry VII in 1509. After failing to win a divorce from Catherine of Aragon, his elder brother's widow, he married Anne Boleyn in defiance of the Roman Catholic church in 1533. Cardinal Wolsey was arrested and died in 1530. Elizabeth (to become Elizabeth II) was born in 1533. Catherine died in 1536. Boleyn was beheaded the same year.

What Shakespeare wrote:
Play written: 1612–1613
• Shakespeare was brought out of retirement to collaborate on this drama with his successor John Fletcher. Its original title was All Is True. It isn't. The events did happen, though not in the order depicted.
• More importantly, motivations have been warped to turn the rapacious Henry VIII, Elizabeth's father, into a conscience-stricken and noble monarch.
• And what's been left out! How about the fact that Boleyn was soon executed.
• Worse, it's a boring play. A political apology wrapped in spectacle.