|
See also: Isaac Asimov
Home pages: The Greatest Literature of All Time
|
|
|||||
Puzzles within puzzles In the 1980s Asimov reread the Foundation stories he had written in the 1940s and had compiled as a trilogy of books in the 1950s, and he was appalled. The stories had no action, no suspense, no romance—they were all thought and dialogue. And yet he found them involving. Even as the author, he found he wanted to read more. So he says in an introduction that appears in most editions of the books. It may also describe the reaction of many readers. These are very talky, ruminative stories. There is big action—a galactic empire starts to crumble, psychohistorian Hari Seldon secretly establishes a repository of science and knowledge in a foundation at a far edge of the galaxy to speed humankind's recovery from the coming dark ages, local warlords fight for power, the foundation's existence is threatened, charismatic figures seize power.... All kinds of action occurs on a large scale. But it isn't at the centre of the books. On centre-stage is a huge mystery being unravelled: the quest for the second foundation that Seldon posthumously reveals he had set up at the opposite end of the galaxy. What Seldon means by the "opposite end" is not so easy to determine. Each of the books in the original Foundation trilogy (Foundation, Foundation and Empire, and Second Foundation) solves the evolving mystery in a way that trumps the previous book. Actually there are more than three puzzles worked out. The trilogy was made from nine stories Asimov wrote to detail the first three hundred years of the Foundation saga. So in each book of the trilogy you get two to five chunks of the mystery, often presenting lines of thought that appear confirmed and then overthrowing them with new solutions as they are worked out in history. Somehow it is all quite a thrilling and mentally stimulating ride. A page turner. Small wonder the trilogy was awarded the Hugo award for best series of all time in 1966, beating out Lord of the Rings. Each of the books added to the series after the trilogy is also involving in its way, but successively less so. Foundation's Edge, written four decades after the first Foundation story, took the saga to another level. Foundation and Earth finds the ultimate solution but suffers from Asimov trying to fit it in with the other science fiction worlds he had created. The last two Foundation books, Prelude to Foundation and Forward the Foundation, are prequels, outlining Hari Seldon's struggle to launch his Foundation project. It may seem sensible to begin reading the series with these to be chronologically correct—but don't! These are the worst written and, without the mystery to solve, the most boring of the lot. They reek of an author creating a memorial. My advice—similar to that I give for Philip José Farmer's great Riverworld series—is to start reading the books in the order they were written and read as far into the series as you enjoy. You may be satisfied with the trilogy or you may, like most readers, feel the need to plough through to the final answer of the fifth book, or you may become so hooked by the universe Asimov created that you'll take even third-rate Foundation with the two prequels. You might even find some stories by other science-fiction writers set in the Foundation universe. Orson Scott Card wrote "The Originist" about the founding of the second foundation, which is collected in an anthology tribute to Asimov. There are no earth-shaking ideas in the Foundation books. Nothing that greatly moves or inspires me as I go about my daily existence. But, you know, I've read the original trilogy at least twice (and the rest of the series at least once), and one of the pleasures I have to look forward to if I live long enough is to get lost in the Foundation saga at least once again in my life. — Eric
|
||||||
|
|
© Copyright 2002-2003 Eric McMillan. All rights reserved.
|
 |
